Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37522-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 664 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pinku Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gyanendra Pathak,Adarsh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. 1. On an objection being raised by learned counsel for the State that the family members of the petitioner have an interest in the adjoining area of disputed land thus, the maintainability of the present writ petition in the public interest is questionable. 2. The objections raised by learned counsel for the opposite parties has force and is not disputed by the petitioner in as much as the owners of the adjoining land or his own parents. 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he does not wish to press this writ petition. 4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 5. We, however, leave it open to the administrative authorities to ensure peace and tranquility at the disputed site by evolving an effective mechanism of demarcation and fencing so that no loss is caused to the agricultural produce of the owners of land at the adjoining place of the site in question which has been earmarked for carrying out the rituals or religious practice. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) (A.R. Masoodi,J.) Order Date :- 3.7.2025 Mayank Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench