- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22810 WP No. 14707 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 14707 OF 2018 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PRAKASH S/O ANJAANAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT JUTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. 2. SMT. ANJANAMMA W/O RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT JUTTANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUNDANAHA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.N. RAVICHANDRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D C OFFICE BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT BENGALURU -560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560009. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22810 WP No. 14707 of 2018 3. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560064. 4. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE P. MUTHAPPA HUNASAMARANAHALLI JALA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560063. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.M.S. VARADARAJAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE ON THE FILE NO.REVN.PET.NO.0161/2011-12 DATED 18.8.2012 IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY NO.32, 189/3 AND 192/7 ANNEXURE-E SITUATED AT HUNASEMARANAHALLI, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioners herein are assailing the order dated 18.08.2012 (Annexure-E) passed by the respondent No.1, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22810 WP No. 14707 of 2018 allowing the Revision Petition No.161/2011-12, filed by the respondent No.4 herein. 3. I have carefully examined the finding recorded by respondent No.1, wherein the parties have to abide by the judgment and decree that may be passed in O.S.No.1040/2007, seeking relief of partition and separate possession in respect of the subject land. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has filed a memo along with the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2024 in O.S.No.1040/2007. In that view of the matter, as the rights of the parties has already been crystallised, wherein the suit filed by the petitioner herein came to be dismissed, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. 6. Pending applications if any, do not survive for consideration. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51