Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14886 (KAR)

SMT. MANJU SURENDRA BHAUWALA v. SRI. MANJUNATH

CCC/98/2025 · 2025-07-07

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24510-DB CCC No. 98 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 98 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. MANJU SURENDRA BHAUWALA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O. SRI. SURENDRA BHAUWALA, RESIDING AT NO.420/13, 13TH MAIN, NEAR M.C. LAYOUT POST OFFICE, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 040. …COMPLAINANT (BY MS. SWATHI S., ADVOCATE FOR MR. SEETHA RAMA RAO AND MR. ANUP SEETHARAM RAO, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SRI. MANJUNATH THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, OFFICE OF THE A.D.L.R, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT- 560 064. 2. SRI. SHREYAS G.S, THE TAHSILDAR, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT – 560 064. ……….…ACCUSED 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. …….PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY MR. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA) Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24510-DB CCC No. 98 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THIS COURT TO INITIATE ACTION FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING DELIBERATELY AND WILL-FULLY DISOBEYED THE ORDERS/ DIRECTIONS OF THIS HON’BLE COURT DATED 08.07.2024 PASSED IN WP NO.17959/2024 (KLR-RES) AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. V KAMESWAR RAO, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) Smt. Swathi, learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant states that, as the respondents have complied with the order of which non-compliance is alleged, she shall withdraw the contempt petition. The contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V KAMESWAR RAO) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE KGR* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26