Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148855 (ALL)

SANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

NA528/673/2025 · 2025-07-01

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37118 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 673 of 2025 Applicant :- Sani Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Smriti Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Ms. Smriti, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Hans Raj Verma, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in 6 cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in 6 criminal cases and has been granted bail by the learned High Court/courts below, the details of cases are as under :- (i) Case Crime No. 370 of 2024, under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, Police Station Harpaalpur, District Hardoi. (ii) Case Crime No. 487 of 2024, under Section 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, Police Station Sansi, District Hardoi. (iii) Case Crime No. 504 of 2024, under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of BNS, Police Station Pali, District Hardoi. (iv) Case Crime No. 512 of 2024, under Section 318(4), 317(2) of BNS, Police Station Pali, District- Hardoi. (v) Case Crime No. 133 of 2025, under Sections 305(B), 317 of BNS, Police Station Harpaalpur, District Hardoi. (vi) Case Crime No. 144 of 2025, under Section 305(2), 317(2) of BNS, Police Station Harpaalpur, District Hardoi. 4. The learned A.G.A has opposed the application stating that the applicant has a long criminal history and, therefore, he is not entitled to receive any discretionary relief by this Court. 5. In response to this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant be permitted to submit a personal bond and two sureties for two lakh each for release in all the 6 cases. 6. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 7. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each and at least one of the two sureties will be a local surety which shall be treated to be valid in all the 6 cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench