Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14884 (KAR)

SMT. PADMA BAI v. SRI. DURGENDRA RAO

WP/1991/2025 · 2025-01-25

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3355 WP No. 1991 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1991 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. PADMA BAI, W/O LATE RAMACHANDRA RAO, D/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT M.G. ROAD, NEAR SRI RAMA TALKIES, RAMANAGARA TOWN-562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MOHAN KUMARA D, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI DURGENDRA RAO, S/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO. SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S. SMT. M. NIRMALA BAI, W/O LATE DURGENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS. 2. D AKHILA BAI, D/O LATE DURGENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 3. DARSHAN RAO. D, S/O LATE DURGENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT MARUTI NAGARA, NEAR GHOUSIA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3355 WP No. 1991 of 2025 RAMANAGARA TOWN-562 159. 4. SMT. MYNA BAI, W/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/AT M.G. ROAD, NEAR SRI RAMA TALKIES, RAMANAGARA TOWN-562 159. 5. NARASINGA RAO, S/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR'S. SMT. UMA BAI, W/O LATE NARASINGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 6. SMT. BHAVANI BAI, D/O LATE NARASINGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 7. SRI YOGESH RAO. N, S/O LATE NARASINGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT: VINAYAKANAGARA, WARD NO.7, RAMANAGARA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 161. 8. SMT. NARASU BAI, W/O KRISHNA SINGH, D/O LATE KRISHNOJI RAO, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT NO.456, KALASIPALYA, RAMANAGARA TOWN-562 120. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 17.12.2024 PASSED BY THE - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3355 WP No. 1991 of 2025 LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAMANAGARA, IN FDP NO. 5/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER Office has raised an objection regarding maintainability. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate legal forum. 3. The memo is taken on record. 4. The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE VP