Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7019 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandra Kant Respondent :- U.P. Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. Thru. Managing Director And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yadukul Shiromani Srivastava (Y.S.Lohit),Aditi Patel,Mamta Tripathi,Shivani Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- Puneet Chandra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of all the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Under challenge is the transfer order dated 13.06.2025, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Obra District- Sonbhadra to Jhansi. The transfer order indicates that the petitioner has been transferred in the interest of Corporation and on his own request. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that subsequent to his transfer order, he submitted a representation dated 17.06.2025, a copy of which is annexure 3 to the writ petition in which he has indicated that he has never submitted an application for his transfer rather the said application has been submitted on the basis of his forged signature by his wife. It is contended that once the representation has already submitted in which the petitioner has denied submission of any said application for his transfer on his own request consequently, it is in the fitness of things that the competent authority be directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law. Responding Sri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel for the respondents states that the petitioner has already been relieved. Be that as it may, once the transfer order of the petitioner itself indicates that the petitioner has been transferred on the basis of his own request and in the interest of the Corporation and the petitioner has denied having submitted any said application for his transfer by means of his representation dated 13.06.2025 as such, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the competent authority who is said to be the respondent no. 2 i.e Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam, Obra Thermal Power Station, Sonbhadra through its Chief General Manager to decide the said representation in accordance with law which representation would be decided within ten days from today. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench