Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
22 07.4.2025
Sc Ct. no.2 WPA 5893 OF 2025
-------------
Hanifa Begum Sekh
Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Sovan Majumder
Ms. Kalpita Paul.
….For the Petitioner
Mr. Partha Ghosh
Mr. Amal Kumar Datta.
….For the Respondents
Mr. Sovan Majumder, learned Counsel appears for the petitioner. Mr. Partha Ghosh, learned Counsel with Mr. Amal Kumar Datta, learned Advocate appears for the respondents. None of the respondents is within the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. The cause of action pleaded in the writ petition arose outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. In view of the above, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this writ petition and to file afresh on the selfsame cause of action before the jurisdictional High Court. Accordingly, for the ends of justice this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with leave to file afresh on
2 the selfsame cause of action before the jurisdictional High Court. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the writ petition and all points are kept open.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)