Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37114 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 675 of 2025 Applicant :- Sabir Ali Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Mishra,Arun Chand Pandey,Ram Bahadur Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Hans Raj Verma, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the record. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in 8 cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in 8 criminal cases and has been granted bail by the learned High Court/courts below, the details of cases are as under :- (i) Case Crime No. 236 of 2024, under Sections 406 409 420 467 468 471 504 506 120 IPC and 66-D IT Act, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No. 237 of 2024, under Section 406 409 420 467 468 471 504 506 120 IPC and 66-D IT Act, Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow. (iii) Case Crime No. 294 of 2024, under Sections 409 201 419 420 467 468 471 506 120-B IPC and 66-D IT Act, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. (iv) Case Crime No. 315 of 2024, under Section 406 420 467 468 471 323 504 506 120-B IPC and 66-D IT (Amendment) Act, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. (v) Case Crime No. 316 of 2024, under Sections 406 420 467 468 471 323 504 506 120-B IPC and 66-D IT (Amendment) Act, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. (vi) Case Crime No. 317 of 2024, under Section 406 420 467 468 471 323 504 506 120-B IPC and 66-D IT (Amendment) Act, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. (vii) Case Crime No. 318 of 2024, under Sections 406 420 467 468 471 323 504 506 120-B IPC and 66-D IT (Amendment) Act, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. (viii) Case Crime No. 319 of 2024, under Sections 406 420 467 468 471 323 504 506 120-B IPC and 66-D IT (Amendment) Act, Police Station Sarojini Nagar, District Lucknow. 4. The learned A.G.A has opposed the application stating that the applicant has a long criminal history and, therefore, he is not entitled to receive any discretionary relief by this Court. 5. In response to this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant be permitted to submit a personal bond and two sureties for two lakh each for release in all the 8 cases. 6. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 7. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each and at least one of the two sureties will be a local surety which shall be treated to be valid in all the 8 cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench