APHC010186672007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25752/2007 Between: 1. CH. BRAHMAIAH, KURNOOL DIST., S/O. MALAKONDAIAH EX. J.R. FITTER R/O.NEAR D/147, OPP. EASTERN COLONY, SRISAILAM PROJECT, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SR GENERAL MANAGER 3 OTHERS, PATEL ENGINEERING LTD., ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS POST SRISAILAM WEST, MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT. 2. THE VICE PRESIDENT, PATEL ENGINEERING LTD., ENGINEERS & CONTRACTORS 6-3-635, 4TH FLOOR, AKASH GANGA APRTS., KHAIRATABAD HYDERABAD 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, A.P. GENERATION CORPORATION LTD., (GENCO) SRISAILAM LEFT BANK SLBHES, MAHABUBNAGAR DISTRICT. 4. THE HONBLE LABOUR COURTIII, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in MP No. 3/2004 dt. 14-7- 2006 on the file of the Hon'ble Labour Court -III at Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequentlyu direct the respondents to pay the amount to the petitioner and to pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 33567 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the case and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PRATAP SINGH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI 3. C RAGHU(SC FOR AP GENCO) The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR