THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER v. ST.MARY GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL
WA(MD)/230/2020 · 2025-06-19
A D Maria Clete, S M Subramaniam
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148804 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148804 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.A.(MD)No.230 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.06.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE W.A.(MD)No.230 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1593 of 2020 1.The Chief Educational Officer, District Educational Office, Thoothukudi. 2.The District Educational Officer, District Educational Office, Thoothukudi. ... Appellants -Vs- St.Mary's Girls High School, Rep., by its Correspondent, Katchanavillai, Tuticorin District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying this Court to set aside the order dated 03.04.2019 made in W.P.(MD)No.3994 of 2019 on the file of this Court. For Appellants : Mr.J.Ashok, Additional Government Pleader https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD)No.230 of 2020 For Respondent : No Appearance
JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] The order of the Writ Court dated 03.04.2019 made in W.P.(MD)No.3994 of 2019 is under challenge in this Writ Petition. 2.The respondent St.Mary's Girls High School filed the said Writ Petition, seeking approval of the appointment of one A.Sahaya Rani as B.T. Assistant in the respondent School. The said Writ Petition was allowed. Challenging the same, the State preferred this Writ Appeal. 3.The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would submit that the appointment was not made in consonance with the rules and therefore, the educational authorities have not granted approval. However, the school has issued a certificate dated 19.06.2025, which is produced by the learned Additional Government Pleader before this Court, stating that the teacher is not working in the school as of now and she has not made any claim against the school Management also. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD)No.230 of 2020 4.In view of the said certificate furnished by the learned Additional Government Pleader for the appellants, no further adjudication is required in this matter, since the school itself is not interested in pursuing the remedy on behalf of the teacher, who left the school already. In view of the above facts, the order of the Writ Court dated 03.04.2019 made in W.P.(MD)No.3994 of 2019 is set aside and accordingly, this Writ Appeal stands allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[S.M.S, J.] & [A.D.M.C., J.]
19.06.2025
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.A.(MD)No.230 of 2020 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. Yuva W.A.(MD)No.230 of 2020 19.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis