M/S HARYANA FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD. v. SHRI AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
ARB.P./798/2025 · 2026-03-17
Vikas Mahajan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1488 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1488 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ARB.P. 798/2025
M/S HARYANA FREIGHT CARRIERS PVT. LTD......Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, Adv.
versus
SHRI AJAY KUMAR GUPTA
....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Gaurav and Mr. Mukul Agarwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R %
10.04.2026
I.A. 9835/2026 (under Sections 151/152/153 CPC seeking correction of Court order dated 17.03.2026)
1. The present application has been filed seeking correction of the order dated 17.03.2026.
2. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated 17.03.2026, it has been wrongly recorded that the date of agreement has been inadvertently mentioned as 03.11.2019, whereas the correct date of agreement is 07.07.2024. In support of his contention, he invites attention of the Court to para 2 of the Booking Associate Agreement which reads thus:
"2. The BA (BOOKING ASSOCIATE) agreement is valid for the period of two year w.e.f Dt.07-07-2024 to Dt. 07-07-2026. This agreement will expire by the efflux of time".
3. In view of the above, para 2 of the order dated 17.03.2026 is corrected to be read as under:
"2. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mathur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner clarifies that in the prayer clause inadvertently the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:44:27
date of agreement has been mentioned as 03.11.2019, whereas, the correct date of agreement is 07.07.2024. The agreement provides for resolution of disputes by arbitration. Clause 19 is the arbitration clause, which reads thus:
"19. Any dispute, differences and or claims arising out of this agreement shall be referred to the sole arbitrator to be appointed by "HFCPL". The place of arbitration shall be at New Delhi only. The award/decision of the Arbitrator shall be binding on both the parties."
4. With the aforesaid correction, the application stands disposed of.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J APRIL 10, 2026/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/04/2026 at 12:44:27