Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010137222025 2025:GAU-AS:12819 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2051/2025 PURNIMA RONGHANGPI AND ANR. WIFE OF LATE DIMBESWAR HAZARIKA 2: RAJYA TERON SON OF LATE DIMBESWAR HAZARIKA BOTH ARE RESIDENT OF PATAR KUCHI BELTOLA DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM M PIN-78102 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF SANTU THAPA, WIFE OF LATE NABIR THAPA, HER LEGAL HEIRS 1. ARATI DEVI WIFE OF DILIP SINGH, R/O DARIKATA NAGAR, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI- 781011 2:BINDU DEVI WIFE OF DEEPAK GURUNG RESIDENT OF DARIKATA NAGAR MALIGAON GUWAHATI-781011 3:GANGA DEVI WIFE OF SANJAY RAI R/O NEW BONGAIGAON 4:JAMUNA DEVI D/O NABIR THAPA P/O. POLICE RESERVE FANCY BAZAR Page No.# 2/3 5:JUNG BAHADUR THAPA SON OF LATE NABIR THAPA RESIDENT OF POLICE RESERVE FANCY BAZAR P/S. PANBAZAR PIN-781001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K M MAHANTA, MS N BEGUM,MR. K SINGHA,MR S GAUTAM,MR K K MAHANTA (Sr. Advocate) Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B PHUKAN (R-5), MR. P KR KALITA (R-5) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel Mr. S. Gautam for the applicants. Also heard Mr. B. Phukan, learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the applicants that the judgment and decree in Title Appeal No. 23/2023 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Div.) No. 1, Kamrup (M) at Guwahati, was delivered on 30.04.2024. It is submitted that the certified copies which were applied for, were received on 15.07.2024. The applicants came to Guwahati on 20.07.2024 and met the learned counsel and there was a delay in preparing the appeal memo. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite parties has raised objection stating that the delay has been erroneously referred to as 19 (Nineteen) days as the delay was for 25 (Twenty Five) days and not 19 (Nineteen) days. The reasons have not been shown. The application ought to be dismissed. Page No.# 3/3 4. I have considered the submissions at the bar. 5. No malafide is discernable on the part of the applicant. 6. Considering all aspects, the delay is condoned. 7. In terms of the above observation, this petition stands disposed of. 8. Registry to register the connected appeal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant