RAJENDRA PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR/DISTT. MAGISTRATE BALRAMPUR AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/6214/2025 · 2025-07-01
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36954-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6214 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector/Distt. Magistrate Balrampur And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The grievance of the petitioner is that during pendency of demarcation proceedings and map correction proceedings, the private opposite parties are raising construction. If it is so, then the remedy is in the pending proceedings or separately as per the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 or before the Civil Court as far as it may be permissible in law. Writ Petition is not the remedy. Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench