Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148711 (ALL)

DHARMENDRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND

A482/5333/2025 · 2025-07-08

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38588 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5333 of 2025 Applicant :- Dharmendra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Shailendra Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Diwaker Singh, the learned A.G.A appearing on behalf of the State and Sri Anurudh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought quashing of the charge sheet No. 01/2021 dated 25.02.2021, arising out of Case Crime No. 232 of 2020, under Sections 323, 468-A, 504 I.P.C and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow along with the entire proceedings of the case in "State Vs. Dharmendra", which is pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate (Custom), Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been instituted on the basis of an F.I.R lodged by the opposite party no.2, who is wife of the applicant no.1 on 11.06.2020 alleging that the applicant, his mother and sister used to harass her for demanding dowry. 4. A copy of of the compromise deed dated 31.01.2025 has been annexed with the application, wherein it has been stated that the F.I.R was lodged due to some bickering between the parties but thereafter the opposite party no.2 has resumed co-habitation with the applicant and she has been blessed with a daughter who is presently aged about 1 and 1/2 years. The opposite party no.2 is residing happily with her husband and she does not want any proceedings to continue against the applicant. 5. The learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has filed a short counter affidavit supporting the prayer for quashing of the criminal proceedings instituted by her on the ground that she has entered into a compromise with the applicant. 6. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and the charge sheet No. 01/2021 dated 25.02.2021, arising out of Case Crime No. 232 of 2020, under Sections 323, 468-A, 504 I.P.C and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow along with the entire proceedings of the case in "State Vs. Dharmendra", is hereby quashed. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench