Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5635 RFA No. 326 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 326 OF 2019 (POS) BETWEEN:
KUM. PANKAJA D/O LAKSHMI DEVI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2/2, GROUND FLOOR, 20TH CROSS, SAMPANGIRAMA NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR.C., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
SRI. T.RAMAIAH S/O LATE THATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT "MANJUGIRI NILAYA", B.M. ROAD, ARKAVATHI EXTENSION, RAMANAGARA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-581 241. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.SRINIVASA., ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:5635 RFA No. 326 of 2019
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 06.02.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant it was ordered to be listed on 07.02.2025.
The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel of the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20