( 2025:JHHC:20689 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 466 of 2024 Jay Prakash Chouhan, aged about 38 years, son of Late Nandu Beldar, resident of Madhuban Parasbania, P.O. Nadkhurkee, P.S. Madhuban, District Madhuban, District Dhanbad. ... Petitioner Versus 1. Sri Sumiran Dutta, father’s name not known to the petitioner, The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, At Koyla Bhawan, P.O. B.C.C.L. Township, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad. 2. Sri Murli Krishna Ramaiyya, father’s name not known to the petitioner, The Director (Personnel), M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, At Koyla Bhawan, P.O. B.C.C.L. Township, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad. 3. Sri Vidyut Saha, father’s name not known to the petitioner, The General Manager (P&IR), M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, At Koyla Bhawan, P.O. B.C.C.L. Township, P.S. Saraidhela, District Dhanbad. 4. Sri Piyush Kishore, father’s name not known to the petitioner, The General Manager, Barora Area No.1, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, at Durma, P.O. Nawagath, P.S. Baghmara, District Dhanbad. 5. Ms. Kajal Sarkar, father’s name not known to the petitioner, The Project Officer, Muraidih Colliery/ Shatabdi O.C.P. Under Barora Area No.1, M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, at Muraidih Collierty, P.O. Nawagarh, P.S. Barora, District- Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Advocate For the O.P. Nos. 1-5 : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate --- Order No.15 Dated 28th July, 2025 Heard Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. Nos. 1 to 5. 2. This contempt application has been preferred by the petitioner for non-compliance of the order dated 22.08.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 2461 of 2020 by this Court wherein on the prayer made by the writ petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment to him, the matter was relegated to the respondent no.5 in the writ application to take an informed decision within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 3. It has been submitted at the outset, by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the appointment letter has already been issued to him. 4. Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the O.P. ( 2025:JHHC:20689 ) 2 Nos. 1 to 5 has produced at the Bar, copy of the appointment letter issued in favour of the petitioner dated 04.07.2025. 5. In view of the issuance of the appointment letter, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and consequently, I am not inclined to proceed further with this contempt application which accordingly, stands disposed of. 6. Let a copy of the appointment letter submitted at the Bar by the learned counsel appearing for the O.P. Nos. 1 to 5 be kept on record. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.) Vedanti/-