SA.No.938/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.02.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR SA.No.938/2008 S.T.Sundari ... Appellant / Plaintiff Vs. 1.S.Chandra 2.Krishnan ... Respondents / Defendants Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Chennai dated 03.04.2006 passed in AS.No.442/2004 confirming the judgment and decree in OS.No.5734/1996 on the file of the learned 12th Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 26.02.2004. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : R1-Died ; R2-Given up 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA.No.938/2008 JUDGMENT (1)When the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant. (2)This Court also noticed that there was no representation for the appellant even when the matter was earlier listed on 17.12.2024. Hence, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this appeal pending. Since the learned counsel for the appellant did not even appeared before this Court, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for non prosecution. (3)Accordingly, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 04.02.2025 AP Internet : Yes To 1.The Additional District Judge, FTC-II, Chennai. 2.The 12th Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA.No.938/2008 S.S. SUNDAR, J., AP SA.No.938/2008 04.02.2025 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis