2025:JHHC:14344 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2998 of 2025 1. Manoj Singh, aged about 40 years, son of Karu Singh 2. Balgovind Singh @ Bali, aged about 48 years, son of Darshan Singh 3. Degani Devi, aged about 46 years, wife of Bikhan Singh 4. Parwati Devi, aged about 51 years, wife of Rambalak Singh All are residents of village – Dahuwatola, PO – Hirodih, PS – Jainagar, District – Koderma, Jharkhand .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioners : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Advocate ------ Order No. 02 / Dated : 03.06.2025. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 34/2025 for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners are men of means and the injuries were found in the hands and legs of the informant and not on the vital part of his body, as such they may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against these petitioners, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today and the learned court below on their surrender shall release them on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 34/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. It is made clear that petitioners shall cooperate in the trial/investigation and if the petitioners will not cooperate in the investigation/trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Pawan/Sangam/ -