Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14869 (GAU)

ASIRUDDIN MONDAL v. THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/3679/2023 · 2025-09-16

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010137282023 2025:GAU-AS:12737 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3679/2023 ASIRUDDIN MONDAL S/O LT. BOSA MONDAL R/O HATIPOTA PT II , P.O. AND P.S BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN 783348 VERSUS THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION AND 4 ORS REP. BY THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER , ASSAM JONAKEE COMPLEX SILPAGRAM ROAD PANJABARI ROAD GUWAHATI 781037 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHUBRI ASSAM 3:STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER O/O THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER CIVIL BILASIPARA P.O. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI PIN 783348 4:STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER O/O THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER DHUBRI PO. DIST. DHUBRI PIN 783348 5:STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER O/O THE ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER BILASIPARA P.O. BILASIPARA DIST. DHUBRI PIN 78334 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K DAS, MR R KARIM,MR D BARMAN Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, INFORMATION COMMISSION BEFORE Page No.# 2/2 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER 17.09.2025 Mr. R. Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. Mr. D. Deka, learned Standing Counsel, State Information Commission for the respondent no. 1 accepts the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous by placing the copy of the letter furnishing information. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant