Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148658 (ALL)

SHIBBU ALIAS VIKAS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

NA528/666/2025 · 2025-07-02

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37589 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 666 of 2025 Applicant :- Shibbu Alias Vikas Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in three criminal cases and has been granted bail by the Sessions Court, the details of cases are as under :- "i. Case Crime No. 95/2025, under Sections 331(4), 305, 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Mohanlalganj, District Lucknow, ii. Case Crime No. 86/2025, under Sections 305-A, 317(2), 331(4) B.N.S., Police Station Nagram, District Lucknow iii. Case Crime No. 20/2025, under Sections 305-A, 331(4), 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Nigoha, District Lucknow." 4. The learned A.G.A has opposed the application stating that the applicant has a long criminal history and, therefore, he is not entitled to receive any discretionary relief by this Court. 5. In response to this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant be permitted to submit a personal bond and two sureties for Rs. 50,000/- each for release in all the 3 cases. 6. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 7. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and atleast one of the two sureties will be a local surety which shall be treated to be valid in all the three cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench