Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148646 (MAD)

M.Manoharan v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP(MD)/18394/2025 · 2025-07-07

Vivek Kumar Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.18394 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD) No.18394 of 2025 M.Manoharan : Petitioner Vs. 1. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam 612 001. 2. The General Manager,, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Kumbakonam Region, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam 612 001. : Respondents P RAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to implement 4 percent of dearness allowance and on the basis of the same to settled the difference amount of gratuity, Pension and earn leave salary along with 6 percent interest on the base of the petitioners representation dated 24.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.18394 of 2025 O R D E R The writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to implement 4 percent of dearness allowance and on the basis of the same to settled the difference amount of gratuity, pension and earn leave salary along with 6 percent interest on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, although several grounds have been raised in the writ petition, it would suffice if this Court issues a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24.03.2025 and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.18394 of 2025 4. Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 24.03.2025 on its own merits and in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 07.07.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PKN To 1. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam 612 001. 2. The General Manager,, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (KMB) Ltd., Kumbakonam Region, New Railway Station Road, Kumbakonam 612 001. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.18394 of 2025 VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. PKN W.P.(MD) No.18394 of 2025 07.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis