Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37073 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5296 of 2025 Applicant :- Amit Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Devendra Pratap,Anmol Srivastava,Ayush Pratap Singh,Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Ayush Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking quashing of the charge sheet dated 15.05.2020, summoning order dated 08.12.2020 and the charge sheet dated 15.05.2020 as well as the entire proceeding of Case No. 1228/2020 arising out of Case Crime No. 0162/2020, under Sections 352, 354, 452, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Police Station Maharajganj, District Fazabad/Ayodhya, which is pending before the Judicial Magistrate-II, District Faizabad/Ayodhya. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the aforesaid prayer and has submitted that while exercising the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this Court cannot go into the correctness of the allegations made against the applicant and has only to examine whether on the basis of the allegations made and material collected during investigation, the offences are made out against the applicant or not. 5. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in C.B.I. v. Aryan Singh, 2023 SCC Online SC 379 has held that while exercising the powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court is not required to conduct a mini trial. It does not require the prosecution/investigating agency to prove the allegations. While exercising the powers under Section 482 of the CrPC the Court has very limited jurisdiction and is required to consider "whether any sufficient material available to proceed further against the accused for which the accused is required to be tried or not". 6. Confronted with the aforesaid objection, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to surrender and move an application, before the court concerned seeking bail and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law. 7. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of by observing that in case the applicant appears and files an application for his release on bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law, including the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. C.B.I., (2021) 10 SCC 773. Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench