IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP Nos.8582 & 8580 of 2025 Decided on: 23rd May, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 8582 of 2025 Veena Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 8580 of 2025 Manju Devi ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Leena Guleria, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Leena Guleria, learned Deputy General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in both the petitions. With the consent of learned 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - counsel for the parties, matters are heard at this stage. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the impugned office order has already been quashed and set aside in CWP No. 7900 of 2025 (Baljeet Kumar Vs. State of H.P. & And.) decided on 22.05.2025. 3. In view of above submission, which is not disputed by learned Deputy Advocate General, respondents are directed to consider the representations of the petitioners afresh in accordance with law keeping in view the decision rendered in Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of HP and Ors2 within a period of three weeks from today. The writ petitions stand disposed of in the above terms, so also the ending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge May 23, 2025 R.Atal 2 CWPOA No.5536 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 01.11.2023