DNYANOBA KUSHABA KHOSE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR
CA/8145/2023 · 2025-07-15
Shri Prafulla S Khubalkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14854 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14854 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
941 CA NO.8146.2023 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8146 OF 2023 IN FAST/10944/2023 MACHINDRA PANDURANG SIRSAT AND ANR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Yuvraj Hange AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. R. R. Tandale … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8145 OF 2023 IN FAST/10946/2023 DNYANOBA KUSHABA KHOSE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Yuvraj Hange AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. K. N. Lokhande … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8144 OF 2023 IN FAST/10948/2023 PRAKASH KASHINATH BHANGE @ KHADKIKAR DIED THR LRS SANDEEP BHAGE @ KHADKIKAR AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR ... Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Yuvraj Hange AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. K. N. Lokhande ….
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. Dated : July 15, 2025 2025:BHC-AUG:18519
941 CA NO.8146.2023 -2- PER COURT :-
1. These are the applications seeking condonation of delay of 235 days caused in filling the first appeals. Mr. Hange,
learned counsel for the applicants submits that their land was acquired and they are seeking enhancement of the compensation. He submits that the applicants are poor persons and were not aware about need to file appeal immediately. After the impugned award was passed, the applicants collected necessary papers, arranged the court fess and then submitted the appeal/s. It is stated that during this process, there is delay of 235 days which is unintentional and hence, it may be condoned in the interest of justice.
2. Mr. Tandale, learned AGP for respondent No. 1 opposes the application and submits that there is no sufficient cause to condone the delay.
3. Having regard to the contentions mentioned in the application and submissions advanced, the delay of 235 days does not appear to be inordinate and hence, it deserves to be condoned in the interest of justice. Therefore, the delay of 235 days caused in filing the first appeal/s is hereby condoned.
941 CA NO.8146.2023 -3-
4. Accordingly, civil applications are allowed and
disposed of. First Appeals be registered.
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. Omkar Joshi