Serial No. 25 Suppl. cause list IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1578/2024 RAQUIB UL RASHID …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS …Respondent (s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDER 19.12.2025 1. On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also when the case was called nobody turned up to appear for the petitioners. 2. In the instant petition, the petitioner claiming to be a protected person is seeking security for protection of his life and property from the respondents. 3. On being put to notice, respondents have filed their objections and have submitted that the competent authority has evaluated the threat perception of the petitioner and has, vide order dated 10th June, 2024, held him not entitled to any security cover from the Government. 4. It seems that the petitioner is satisfied with the reply submitted by the respondents and has decided to abandon this petition, which is accordingly dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 19.12.2025 “Shahid Manzoor”