P a g e | 1 Item No. 42 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Cont. Cas(C) No. 87 of 2024 Ref:- Cont.Cas(C) No. 119 of 2016 & WP(C) No. 1024 of 2015 P. Jibon Singh …Petitioner - Versus - Vineet Joshi and 3 Others …Respondents B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. D. KRISHNAKUMAR O R D E R 03.04.2025 [1] Mr. I. Somorjit Singh, learned counsel, appears for the petitioner; Ms. Rinika Maibam, learned counsel, appears for the respondent No. 1;Ms. I. Bimola, learned counsel, appears for respondent No. 2; Mr. M. Devananda, Additional Advocate General assisted by Ms. N. Jyotsana, learned counsel, appears for the respondent No. 3. [2] The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondent No. 3 states that they have already informed the Court that respondents have paid the undisputed amount to the petitioner, as per the direction passed by this Court but the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought time for getting instructions on the last date of hearing on 06.03.2025. [3] Today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that they have no objection in closing the contempt petition since the order SHAMURAILATPA M SUSHIL SHARMA Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA Date: 2025.04.04 15:35:29 +05'30' P a g e | 2 of the Court is complied with by the respondents. [4] In view of the above, since the order of the Court is complied with, the contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil