Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14849 (ALL)

VIPAN YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/2063/2025 · 2025-02-26

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26970-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2063 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vipan Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhlendra Pratap Singh,Deleep Kumar Chaudhari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the First Information Report dated 12.01.2025 registered as Case Crime no.0009 of 2025, Under Sections 137(2), 351(3) B.N.S-2023 Police Station- Amapur, District-Kasganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he is not pressing the writ petition qua the first petitioner as he is already arrested. 4. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions, states that in the instant matter, during investigation Section 70(2) BNS and Section 5/6 I.T. Act have also been added and the investigation about the complicity of the second petitioner is in progress. 5. After substantial argument, once the court has declined to quash the impugned first information report, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners do not want to press the writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed and leave may be accorded to invoke the remedy as available in law. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to say, in case the petitioners are aggrieved, they may avail the remedy as available in law. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Order Date :- 27.2.2025 NLY Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad