Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148468 (ALL)

MOID AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/6966/2025 · 2025-07-02

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37087 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6966 of 2025 Petitioner :- Moid Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sukh Deo Singh,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 5. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Under challenge is transfer order dated 15.06.2025, a copy of which is annexure no.1 to the petition by which the petitioner has been transferred from district Ambedkar Nagar to Bareilly. Learned counsel for petitioner has raised various grounds to challenge the impugned transfer order, however the Court is of the view that the said grounds fall in the realm of the grounds to be considered by the respondents at the first instance. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation against the impugned transfer orders dated 15.06.2025 before the competent authority i.e. Managing Director, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, Lucknow/respondent no. 3 within a period of one week from today. In case a representation is made, respondent no. 3 shall proceed to decide the same in accordance with law considering the grounds taken by the petitioner in the representation, which would be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation alongwith copy of this order. Till disposal of representation no coercive action shall be taken by the respondents against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned transfer order. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not submit his representation within the time specified, then the benefit of this order shall not be available to him. Order Date :- 2.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench