Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14846 (RAJ)

RAHUL KUMAR MEENA S/O AMAR CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4887/2025 · 2025-07-15

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4887/2025 Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Amar Chand, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Miyo Ka Mohalla, Nivana, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur, Presently Residing At Plot No. 31, Salasar Vatika, Sarna Doongar, Police Station Kardhani. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Singhal For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 15/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.290/2025 registered at Police Station- Kardhani, District-Jaipur (West) for the offence under Sections 333, 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 189(2) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that as per the medical report itself there is no life threatening injury to injured-Manish Sharma as well as to his wife. No criminal record exists against the petitioner. The petitioner is behind the bars [2025:RJ-JP:26259] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4887/2025] since 26.03.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Rahul Kumar Meena S/o Amar Chand shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/75