FAYAZ AHMAD MIR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3275/2025 · 2025-12-26
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14846 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14846 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 91 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3275/2025 CM(8805/2025) Fayaz Ahmad Mir. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Bhat Fayaz Ahmad, Advocate with Ms. Nighat Amin, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 26.12.2025
01. While the matter was being argued, the learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with the issue of maintainability of the instant writ petition, as the same is premature.
02. The petitioner through the medium of the instant writ petition has called in question a proposal mooted by the Tehsil Supply Officer, Food Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department, Rafiabad-B, Baramulla, and forwarded to the concerned Cabinet Minister, for creation of new Fair Price Shops as per SRO 41 of FCS&CA Department at Circle Rafiabad-B.
03. The proposal which has been assailed by medium of the instant writ petition, is in the nature of inter se communication between the concerned Tehsil Supply Officer and Cabinet Minister concerned, which is yet to be accepted or rejected by the competent authority. The petitioner, without waiting for the outcome of the same and without
disclosing as to how and under what circumstances, he is aggrieved of the aforesaid proposal, has approached this Court at a premature stage.
04. When confronted with the issue of maintainability of the instant writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the same, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition as and when the cause of action accrues to the petitioner.
05. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn being premature, with liberty as prayed. However, the dismissal of the instant writ petition shall not come in the way of the petitioner to agitate his grievance before the appropriate authority by way of a representation, in the event the aforesaid proposal culminates into an order affecting any of the rights of the petitioner.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 26.12.2025
“HAMID”