FARIDA BEGUM AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/1226/2023 · 2025-12-19
Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14845 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14845 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.13 SUPPL. CAUSE LIST-I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1226/2023 CM(2911/2023) Farida Begum & Another …Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER 19.12.2025
1. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, when the case was called nobody turned up to appear on behalf of the petitioners.
2. Otherwise also, having regard to the nature of the controversy involved in this petition, this petition by efflux of time has been rendered infructuous. The petitioners, who claim to have entered into matrimonial wedlock out of their free will and volition and were apprehending risk to their life and property from the private respondents, have been enjoying their life without their being any interim direction passed by this Court, meaning thereby they never had any MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 23.12.25
threat to their life and property. It seems that this petition was filed on a misconceived apprehension. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 19.12.2025
“Mir Arif” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 23.12.25