GHULAM HASSAN SOFI AND ANR. v. BASEER UL HAQ CHAUDHARY (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
CCP(S)/459/2021 · 2025-11-26
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14844 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14844 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 48
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 459/2021 in[OWP 1839/2018] GHULAM HASSAN SOFI AND ANR. …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mansoor, Advocate. Vs.
BASEER UL HAQ CHAUDHARY ...Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
O R D E R 26.11.2025 Compliance report stands filed, perusal whereof reveals that order dated 03.10.2018, which is sought to be enforced by virtue of present petition stands complied with. The claim of the petitioner being found devoid of merit has been rejected as such, present petition does not survive. In view of above, contempt notice is withdrawn and contempt is dropped. However, petitioners are at liberty to assail the rejection order.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 26.11.2025 Ishaq