Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14843 (AP)

KINJARAPU NEELAVANI AND 4 OTHERS v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND 5 OTHERS

WP/11335/2011 · 2025-07-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010186372011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 11335/2011 Between: 1. KINJARAPU NEELAVANI, UNEMPLOYEE R/O. DURGA S.H.G. BANAM VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. ALIKANA RADHAMMA, W/O RAMCHANDRA RAO UNEMPLOYEE R/OSRI SATYASAI, SGH. ATCHIPOLAVALASA VILLAGE PONDURU VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. KUTIKUPPALA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O VENKATA APPALANAIDU UNEMPLOYEE SRI SATYASAI, SGH. R/O KINTALI VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. ANAKAPALLI ANUSHA, W/O RANGA RAO UNEMPLOYEE, BHARATHAMATHA S.G.H. R/O PONDUR VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. GURUBALLI VENKATARATNAM, W/O TEJHESWARA RAO UNEMPLOYEE, JAI BHAVANI SGH. R/O PILLAVALASA VILLAGE, PONDUR MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AT SRIKAKULAM 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR D R D A SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT AT, SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE MANAGER LEAD BANK ANDHRA BANK SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER ANDHRA BANK SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. THE CHIEF DIRECTOR BREADS ORGANIZATION PATHAPATNAM, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PONDUR MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or orders or in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the impugned action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioners as S.G.H as CSP. for social security pension and Smart Card Project Pursuant to other selections made by the competent authority vide Lr.No.14-06-2010 of the 6th respondent while appointment the candidates in other adjacent Mandals is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust and violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner are entitled for appointment as SHG as C.S.P for S.S.P and Smart Card Project in Ponduru Mandal with all consequential benefits. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 13894 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the appointment of the petitioners as S.G.H as CSP. for social security pension and Smart Card Project Pursuant to other selections made by the competent authority vide Lr.No.14-06-2010 of the 6th respondent Ponduru Mandal, Srikakulam District as was done in the case of other adjacent mandals. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KRISHNA RAO MODHALAVALASA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 11335 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners. It evinces that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting their case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:11335 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP