COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT GOCHAR MAHAVIDAYALAYA v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/3287/2025 · 2025-02-04
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14842 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14842 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:16115 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3287 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Gochar Mahavidayalaya Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Kumar Yadav,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 and perused the record.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been granted affiliation in Self-Finance Scheme for certain subjects in the college namely Gochar Mahavidyalaya, Rampur, Maniharan, Saharanpur. It is submitted that for the session 2023-24 extension of affiliation in those subjects was granted for one year on the ground that there was a dispute with the Committee of Management of the college, and further there was shortage of teachers. Subsequently, again extension of affiliation was granted by order dated 11.07.2024 for one year for the session 2024-25 on the ground that there was a dispute with the Committee of Management of the college.
3. It is contended that in fact there was no dispute with the Committee of Management of the college, therefore, the petitioner has submitted an application before respondent no.3 that since there is no dispute with the Committee of Management of the college, therefore, the college is entitled to extension of affiliation for unlimited period.
4. Learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3 state that no purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending or calling for a counter affidavit and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation annexing thereto all relevant documents on which it may seek to rely before respondent no.3 within a period of one month from today, who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two months thereafter, in accordance with law, after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. Order Date :- 5.2.2025 CS/- Digitally signed by :- CHANDAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad