Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14838 (GAU)

HABIB AHMED v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./2109/2024 · 2025-01-26

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010136432024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2109/2024 HABIB AHMED S/O NOIMUL HOQUE, R/O VILL- KANAKPUR, P.O. AND P.S.-NILAMBAZAR, DIST- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN-788724 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, MR. S DUTTA,MS S MOCHAHARI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/22/2025 HABIB AHMED - S/O NOIMUL HOQUE R/O VILL- KANAKPUR P.O. AND P.S.-NILAMBAZAR DIST- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN-788724 VERSUS Page No.# 2/3 THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : Sidhant Dutta Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 27.01.2025 1. Heard learned Senior Counsel Mr. S. Dutta for the applicant/petitioner Habib Ahmed. 2. The applicant/petitioner has filed this interlocutory application with prayer for amendment of the inadvertent error in the cause-title of the Bail Application No. 2109/2024, where the provisions under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been typed instead of Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Nyaya Samhita, 2023. 3. Prayer is allowed and wherever in the cause-title, the words, 439 of the Cr.PC is typed, it can be rectified and typed as Section 483 of the BNSS. 4. In terms of the above observation, application stands disposed of. 5. This order will form a part of the bail order in connection with B.A.No. 2109/2024. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant