Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39167 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 609 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahraj Singh Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation, Unnao And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh,Ankit Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1, 2 & 3 as well as Mr. Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent No.5/ Gao Sabha. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to private respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer: " Wherefore, it most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party no.1 to register the revision of the petitioner and pass the orders and interim order which was preferred by the petitioner within time under section 48 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, against the order dated 25.10.2024 passed by the Settlement officer Consoldiation Unnao (S.O.C.) in appeal No. 298/2024, Computerised No.2024541069000008731 (Mahraj Singh versus Smt. Ranjana Devi and another) under section 21(2) of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act contained in Annexure No. 1 to this this petition." 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents on the basis of instruction has informed this Court that the revision filed by the petitioner has already been registered as Case No.0951/2024, Computrized Case No.202454106900000951 (Maharaja Singh Vs. Smt. Ranjana Devi and Others) and the same was registered on 29.11.2024 and the next date fixed for hearing is 08.07.2025. 5. In the light of the fact that the revision filed by the petitioner has already been registered and the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present case as stated in prayer No.1 has been redressed and once the Deputy Director Consolidation, Unnao is seized of the revision, there would be no occasion to interfere or pass any order with regard to the grievance of the petitioner since all the grounds can be canvassed and raised before the revisional authority. 6. It is provided that if any application for interim relief is filed by the petitioner, the same shall also be considered and decided by the authorities concerned, in accordance with law. 7. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case and the reasons recorded here-in-above, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 (Manoj K.) (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench