Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14837 (JK)

M/S RATHER DAIRY FARM v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME)

WP(C)/2554/2025 · 2025-10-15

Mohd Yousuf Wani

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 169 SUPPLEMENTARY LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2554/2025 M/S RATHER DAIRY FARM …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Aushaq Hussain Shah, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE ORDER 15.10.2025 1. The case of the petitioner in nutshell is that he is a lawful operator and owner of M/S Rather Dairy Farm, duly registered under registration No. SE 9476299 of Kulgam, and is engaged in the legitimate transportation and rearing of livestock essential for dairy purposes. That despite possessing valid permissions, health certificates and clearances issued by competent authorities, he faces persistent harassment, arbitrary delays and obstructions at Toll Post, Lakhanpur, as well as by the Liver Fluke-cum-Rinderpest Control Officer. That such actions are devoid of legal justification and have gravely impeded the petitioner’s lawful business operations. That despite several representations seeking protection and redressal in respect of such arbitrary hinderances, the respondents have failed to act, thereby committing a breach of their statutory obligations. 2. The petitioner while foregoing the other reliefs has only sought the issuance of writ/direction in the nature of mandamus for commanding upon the respondents to take appropriate measures so as to ensure his safety and security as well as of the vehicles used for transporting cattle by shielding them from any threats. 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner who submitted that he is the lawful owner and operator of a Dairy Farm functioning under the name and style of M/S Rather Dairy Farm, located at Churat Devsar District Kulgam. That the petitioner is legally authorized to procure and transport cattle from outside Union Territory for the purposes of operating the Dairy Farm. That in addition to his commercial operations, the petitioner regularly contributes to public service initiatives by supplying milk to the camps organized during the annual Shri Amarnathji Yatra. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner holds a valid registration certificate bearing No. SE 9476299 of Kulgam issued by the competent authority, as well as the specific permission for import and transport of livestock granted by Chief Animal Husbandry Officer vide his No. CAHO/Kulg/1510-11 dated 29.09.2025. That the petitioner has consistently demonstrated exemplary conduct in the course of his business and there have been no instances or allegations by the UT authorities indicating any of his involvement in illegal activities or those that could potentially lead to a civil disorder. That notwithstanding the petitioner’s valid permissions and authorizations, as evidenced by the documents forming annexures to the petition, the respondents particularly the Excise Department and at the Tool Post, Lakhanpur, and the Liver Fluke-cum- Rinderpest Control Officer, have caused significant delays in processing the requisite formalities and issuing the necessary certificates. That such delays have not only caused considerable hardship and inconvenience to the petitioner but also endangered his life and property. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the relief sought, the matter can be disposed of even at this stage by passing of appropriate directions, action under which is otherwise a legal obligation of the respondents. 5. This court, in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the relief sought is of the opinion that, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter can be disposed of even at this threshold stage by passing of appropriate directions which are not likely to prejudice the interests of either party. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of at this stage with the direction that the petitioner shall be provided necessary security as and when required by the concerned respondents in the course of his transportation of the cattle in the vehicles, strictly in accordance with the permissions granted by the concerned authorities. 7. Disposed of along with the connected miscellaneous application. (MOHD YOUSUF WANI) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 15.10.2025 Akhil Dev