KASHIM ANSARI ALIAS KASIM ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2999/2025 · 2025-06-03
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14831 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14831 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:14394 )
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2999 of 2025
1. Kashim Ansari @ Kasim Ansari, aged about 25 years, S/O Basuruddin Miya.
2. Tosif Shekh, aged about 42 years, S/O Raja Hussain Sekh.
3. Lal Mohammad Ansari @ Lal Md. Ansari, aged about 27 years, S/O Samruddin Ansari.
4. Mukshed Ansari @ Musjid Ansari, aged about 23 years, S/O Sakur Miyan.
5. Altamas Shekh, aged about 27 years, S/O Alam Shekh.
6. Alam Shekh @ Md. Alam Shekh, aged about 51 years, S/O Raja Hussain Shekh. (All resident of village – Pindari, PO – Gopibandh, PS – Sarath, District – Deoghar, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Parties ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, APP
---
02/03rd June 2025
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending their arrest in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025 instituted under Sections 190, 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 121(1), 125(b), 132, 109, 351(2), 352, 324 (3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and their names have been falsely implicated in the instant case with an ulterior motive in order to harass and blackmail them. He further submits that there is no evidence on record with regard to disclosure of the identity of the petitioners and the police at the instance of local persons, who were at inimical terms with the present petitioners, had named them in the FIR.
4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail.
( 2025:JHHC:14394 )
2
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to these petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhupur in connection with Sarath P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025.
6. It is made clear that petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation / trial. If the petitioner will not co-operate with the investigation / trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Aditi/Simran