Haobam Nganba and Another v. Branch Manager ICICI Bank and 2 Others
WP(C)/493/2025 · 2025-08-26
A Guneshwar Sharma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1483 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1483 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
81-82 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No.493 of 2025 with MC(WP(C)) No.475 of 2025
Haobam Nganba & Anr … Petitioners -Versus- Branch Manager, ICICI Bank &2 Ors
… Respondents
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 27.8.2025
Heard Mr.K.Roshan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.I.Rajesh, learned counsel for the ICICI Bank.
Mr.K.Roshan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Savings Bank Accounts; (i) No.431801000353 of ICICI Bank, Imphal Branch and (ii) No.50140100004245 of Bank of Baroda, Kongba Branch, Imphal Manipur, have been freezed on the complaint of the S.H.O. Cyber Crime Police Station, Outer North District, Bawana Sector-1, New Delhi.
However, the ICICI Bank and Bank of Baroda, do not give any intimation about the disputed amount allegedly involved with the Accounts of the petitioner maintained with them and since the accounts have been freezed petitioner has been facing difficulties in running business. Accordingly, it is prayed that the respondents/Banks be directed to defreeze the Bank Accounts of the petitioner.
Mr.I.Rajesh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court may pass appropriate order.
This Court has perused the materials available on record and considered the submissions made at the Bar. No specific
amount is mentioned for freezing the account. In the circumstance, the respondents are directed to defreeze the accounts of the petitioner maintained with them.
With the above direction, the writ petition is closed. Misc case also stand closed.
JUDGE
Priyojit
RAJKUMA R PRIYOJIT SINGH Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2025.08.28 16:25:54 +05'30'