Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14829 (UTT)

MANOJ PARKI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRJA/6/2022 · 2025-12-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRJA No.6 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. V.P. Bahuguna, learned Counsel for the appellant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. By judgment dated 13.12.2021 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khatima, U.S. Nagar in S.T. No.101 of 2020, appellant was convicted u/s 333 IPC and sentenced to undergo five years’ R.I. with fine of Rs.5,000/- along with default stipulation; he was further convicted u/s 353 IPC and sentenced to undergo two years’ R.I. with fine of Rs.2,000/- along with default stipulation of two months’ additional R.I. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. 4. By previous order, learned State Counsel was asked to bring the custody report in view of the fact that a statement had come from the side of learned amicus curiae that the appellant had served out the sentence. Today learned State counsel is ready with the instructions. The same are kept with the record. 5. From the instructions, it transpires that the appellant has already served out the sentence imposed against him and has also been released from jail on 25.05.2024. 6. In such view of the matter, the appeal has rendered infructuous and it is dismissed as such. 7. However, it shall be open to the appellant to move an application seeking recall of this order if he desires to challenge his conviction. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.12.2025 R.Dang