[2025:RJ-JP:23922] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 457/2006. 1. Gajanand son of Shri Hari Prasad, aged 58 years resident of Jatwada Khurd, Tehsil & District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 1/1. Shri Naval Kishore Sharma S/o Shri Gajanand Sharma aged about 48 years, R/o Jatwada Khurd, Mantown Tehsil and District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 1/2 Shri Kapil Dev S/o Shri Gajanand Sharma aged about 44 years, Jatwada Khurd, Mantown Tehsil and District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 1/3 Gyatri Devi D/o Shri Gajanand Sharma aged about 50 years, R/o 2/285, Housing Board, Alanpur Gramin, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 1/4 Vimla Devi D/o Shri Gajanand Sharma aged about 46 years, R/o Ward No. 12 Vedo ka Mohalla, Aligarh, Tonk (Raj.) 1/5 Kishna Devi D/o Shri Gajanand Sharma aged about 44 years, R/o 882, Brampuri Mohalla Bhagwatpur, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Plaintiffs-Appellants Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through the collector, Sawai Madhopur 2. Nagar Palika, through Executive Officer, Sawai Madhopur 3. Shiv Dayal S/o Suraj Mal since deceased through his legal representative 3/1 Raj Kumar S/o Late Shiv Dayal 3/2 Vinod S/o Late Shiv Dayal Garg 3/3 Arvind S/o Late Shiv Dayal Garg 3/4 Vipin S/o Late Shiv Dayal Garg 4. Deen Dayal S/o Suraj Mal since deceased through his legal representative 4/1 Ashok aged about 42 years 4/2 Shyam aged about 39 years 4/3 Pradeep aged about 37 years all sons of late Deen Dayal, R/o Jatwara Khurd, Mantown, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Defendants-Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Yadav, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 30/06/2025 : [2025:RJ-JP:23922] (2 of 2) [CFA-457/2006] The present first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been preferred on behalf of plaintiffs- appellants against the impugned judgment & decree dt.03.06.2006 passed by the Court of ld. Additional District & Sessions Judge, (Fast Track), Sawai Madhopur, in Civil Suit No.35/2004 (40/2000), whereby the suit filed by the appellants/plaintiffs for declaration & permanent injunction filed against the defendants, was dismissed. Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that during the pendency of the present appeal, both the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and have entered into a compromise/ settlement dt.25.03.2025 in the spirit of Lok Adalat outside the Court. In this regard, an application bearing Inward No.1/2025 has also been filed on behalf of appellants praying therein for disposal of the present appeal in terms of compromise arrived at between the parties. Heard. Perused. As per compromise dt.25.03.2025 both the parties do not want to pursue the matter & the dispute between them has been settled amicably. After going through the contents of the aforesaid application & considering the submissions made at bar, the application is allowed. Consequently, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of aforesaid compromise. The decree be drawn up accordingly. The terms of the compromise shall be treated as an integral part of this order. The stay application & other pending application, if any, are also stand disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J. ASHOK/