Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14823 (PNJ)

HRITHIK SINGH v. PRERNA SURI, DIRECTOR AND ANR

COCP/389/2025 · 2025-08-18

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-389 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 217 Hrithik Singh Prerna Puri and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. the second round learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. willful violation co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP vs. Union Territory Chandigarh and others directed to order would take care of judgment dated CWP-26092 Administration and within 04 weeks. 2. of the aforesaid order dated dated 07.02.2025 (Annexure R 389-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Hrithik Singh Versus Prerna Puri and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Ms. Shivani Jaglan, Advocat for Ms. Madhu Dayal, Senior Standing Counsel and Ms. Aashna Gill, Junior Panel Counsel for UT Chandigarh for the respondent(s). NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner the second round, as such the present petition is disposed of in the absence of learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner has filed the present Contempt Petition violation of order dated 11.12.2024 ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP-33345 Union Territory Chandigarh and others’ re-examine the claim of the petitioner and while passing fresh order would take care of judgment dated 25.10.2013 passed by this Court in 26092-2012 titled as ‘Rajbir Singh and another Vs. Chandigarh Administration and others’. It was also directed that the needful be done within 04 weeks. Learned counsel for the respondent of the aforesaid order dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure P 07.02.2025 (Annexure R-1, at page No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-389-2025 Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Ms. Shivani Jaglan, Advocat for Ms. Madhu Dayal, Senior Standing Counsel and Ms. Aashna Gill, Junior Panel Counsel for UT Chandigarh There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in as such the present petition is disposed of in the absence of filed the present Contempt Petition alleging 11.12.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a 33345-2024 titled as ‘Hrithik Singh ’, whereby the respondents were examine the claim of the petitioner and while passing fresh 25.10.2013 passed by this Court in ‘Rajbir Singh and another Vs. Chandigarh It was also directed that the needful be done respondents informs that in compliance 11.12.2024 (Annexure P-1), speaking order 1, at page Nos. 30 and 31 of the paper-book) even in as such the present petition is disposed of in the absence of alleging ssed by a pondents were examine the claim of the petitioner and while passing fresh 25.10.2013 passed by this Court in ‘Rajbir Singh and another Vs. Chandigarh It was also directed that the needful be done informs that in compliance , speaking order book) RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.19 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-389 has been passed Administration (Annexure P present petition. 3. to be passed in the present petition accordingly. 4. 5. 18.08.2025 rishu 389-2025 -2- has been passed by the Director, School Education, Chandigarh Administration. Thus, it is submitted that the order dated (Annexure P-1) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the present petition. In view of the facts noted above, to be passed in the present petition, the same accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable by the Director, School Education, Chandigarh that the order dated 11.12.2024 1) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the above, no further orders are required the same stands disposed of, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No by the Director, School Education, Chandigarh 1) stands duly complied with and nothing survives in the no further orders are required , RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.19 10:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.