Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148225 (ALL)

MANJU DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/5747/2025 · 2025-06-27

Alok Mathur, Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36743-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5747 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manju Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harshit Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Harshit Singh, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner has lodged a complaint on the Chief Minister's Public Grievance Portal assailing the validity of the appointment issued in favour of respondent no. 4 who according to the petitioner had secured a government job using forged educational certificates. 4. It has been submitted that on the basis of the complaint made by the petitioner, an inquiry was conducted and the services of respondent No. 4 was dispensed with. Subsequently he submits that he is being constantly threatened by respondent No. 4 and has written a complaint to the S.H.O., P.S. Naveeen Modern, District Shravasti as well as Superintendent of Police, District Sharavasti but no action has been taken. 5. Accordingly, in the aforesaid circumstances, a prayer has been made for a direction to state respondents to imitate fair and proper investigation of the case and provide police protection to the petitioner. Considering the submission made by the petitioner which pertains only to the fact that on the basis of his complaint no first information report has been lodged, we find that petitioner has adequate statutory remedy U/S 175(3) of B.N.S.S. to move an application before the concerned Magistrate who can direct registration of the first information report. 6. Accordingly, in light of the availability of effective statutory remedy we are not inclined to entertain this petition made by the petition and petitioner is relegated to statutory remedy. 7. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 27.6.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench