PRAKARSH TIWARI, MINOR THRU. HIS MOTHER MADHURI v. UNION OF INDIA THRU.THE SPECIAL SECY. EDUCATION DEPTT. NEW DELHI AND 4 OTHERS
SPLAD/270/2025 · 2025-09-01
Manjive Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148200 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 270 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. On 26.06.2025, we had passed the following order:-
"1. By means of the present special appeal, the appellant has assailed the validity of the judgement and order of Hon'ble Single Judge dated 11.4.2025 in Writ-C No. 821 of 2025 wherein the petition, seeking a direction for admission in Kendriya Vidyalaya, Gomati Nagar, Lucknow, has been rejected.
2. Ms. Riya Ghosh, learned counsel for the appellant, has argued the matter at length and subsequently, has confined her prayer only for due consideration on admission of the appellant to Kendriya Vidyalaya, Memaura Station Branch, Lucknow. It is stated that the appellant was offered admission in the said school which has also been recorded in paragraph No.19 of the impugned judgement.
3. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the controversy, let instructions be sought by Ms. Pushpila Bisht, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan to inform this Court whether there is any vacancy in the said institution on which the appellant shall be considered for admission in Class-IV.
4. List this case on 7.7.2025 in top ten cases."
2. Today, Ms Pushpila Bist, counsel appearing for the Kendriya Vidyalaya has written instructions to inform the Court that the petitioner-student can be given admission in Class-IV at Kendriya Vidyalaya, Memaura Station Branch, Lucknow.
3. The petitioner's counsel readily accepts the offer.
4. Let the petitioner approach the Principal of the said school, who shall do the needful at the earliest. Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Riya Ghosh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Pushpila Bisht Prakarsh Tiwari, Minor Thru. His Mother Madhuri .....Appellant(s) Union Of India Thru.The Special Secy. Education Deptt. New Delhi And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In light of the what has been noticed hereinabove, the petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
6. This offer has been made by the opposite parties in exceptional circumstances which need not by itself be treated as a precedent. September 1, 2025 Renu/- SPLAD No. 270 of 2025 2 (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench