2025:UHC:10386 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Bail Application No.7 of 2025 21st November, 2025 Sanjay Ahuja --Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand --Respondent ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Shruti Joshi, learned legal aid counsel for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Applicant Sanjay Ahuja, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No. 255 of 2024, under Sections 8/21/29 of NDPS Act, registered at P.S. Doiwala, District Dehradun, has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 3. According to the prosecution case, on 23.08.2024 at 17:30 hours, during the personal search of the accused by the police party at Haridwar Road Kuanchala, Harrawala, opposite Vidlas River Valley, within the jurisdiction of P.S. Doiwala, 263 grams of illegal smack was recovered from his possession in a foil. 2025:UHC:10386 2 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the matter; that, no inventory was prepared at the spot, nor is there any certificate of inventory prepared or certified by the Magistrate. She further submits that the applicant has no previous criminal history and is in judicial custody since 23.08.2024. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that although Section 37 of the NDPS Act imposes twin conditions for grant of bail, the Court must also consider whether there are serious procedural lapses affecting the credibility of the prosecution case. 6. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the applicant was apprehended with commercial quantity contraband. He, however, submits on the basis of instructions received from the Investigating Officer that inventory was not prepared at the spot. 7. In view of the above, but, without expressing any opinion about merits of the case before the Trial Court, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case for bail. 8. The bail application is thus, allowed and the 2025:UHC:10386 3 applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. (Alok Mahra, J.) 21.11.2025 BS BALWAN T SINGH Digitally signed by BALWANT SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=fbbd191c8bdb8b16e8ca7937deaf72a 17c02fe2eacbf28cdf4ba7ce8640c5820, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=04E141DF4614F9A4D5F48346E B553DE5185F418755DC00A7A13C14A680C3FA 90, cn=BALWANT SINGH Date: 2025.11.21 14:10:12 +05'30'