Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 148107 (ALL)

CHITRANSH SRIVASTAVA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN. SECY. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/5260/2025 · 2025-07-01

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:36935 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5260 of 2025 Applicant :- Chitransh Srivastava And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Shekhar Singh Yadav,Sandeep Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mohd. Asim Khan, the learned A.G.A-I for the State and Sri Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 is taken on record. 2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the applicant has sought quashing of the charge sheet No. 01/2024 dated 16.03.2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 16 of 2024, under Sections 498-A and 506 I.P.C and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Gosaiganj, District Lucknow as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 4046 of 2025 and summoning order dated 07.09.2024 passed by the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 6th, Lucknow, which is pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate- 3rd, Lucknow. 3. The applicant no.1 is husband of the opposite party no.2, the F.I.R was lodged because of some matrimonial dispute and the parties have entered into a settlement deed dated 03.05.2025, which has been annexed with the application and both of them have given consent to lead their married life happily. 4. The applicant had filed an application under section 482 Cr.P.C. No. 4046 of 2025, which was disposed of by means of an order dated 15.05.2025 directing the trial court to verify the compromise. The compromise has been verified by means of an order dated 21.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-6th, Court No-27, Lucknow. 5. Sri Pradeep Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has supported the prayer made by the applicant and has given his consent for proceedings being quashed on the basis of compromise. 6. Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the charge sheet 16.03.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 4046 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 16 of 2024, under Sections 498-A and 506 I.P.C and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Gosaiganj, District Lucknow are hereby quashed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 1.7.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench