Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:38194 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 819 of 2025 Applicant :- Rahul @ Rahul Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present bail application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.8/2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 132, 118(2), 352, 351(3), 121(2), 3(5) of BNS and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Ram Janam Bhumi, District Ayodhya. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. General allegations have been levelled in the prosecution case. Applicant has no criminal history. Learned A.G.A. on the other hand has submitted that F.I.R. has been lodged by the police. Three police personnels have been injured. Applicant along with other co-accused persons have caused disruption in performance of a public duty by the police officials and they have brutally beaten the police personnels by lathi, danda etc and stone pelting was done. Three police men are injured. Out of three injured persons, Sujeet Yadav has received grievous injury. It is not a case of false implication. The independent witnesses as well as the injured have supported the prosecution case. Perused the record. On due consideration to the case diary shown by the learned A.G.A., the nature of grievous injury received by the injured Sujeet Yadav so also the other injured persons, the complicity of the applicant is evident, it is not a case of false implication and therefore, no case for anticipatory bail is made out accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he may given liberty to file a regular bail application in view of law laid by Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another. In view of the above, it is provided that in case a regular bail application is filed within twenty days' from today before the court below, the same be decided expeditiously in view of the law laid by by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench