Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1481 (HP)

PRITAM SINGH v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

EX.P./2300/2025 · 2026-04-08

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 2300 of 2025 Decided on: 08.04.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pritam Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in this petition on 18.03.2026:- “Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 18.02.2026, which have been perused. Despite grant of final opportunity, judgment in question has not been complied with. At the request of learned Additional Advocate General, two weeks’ further time, by way of yet another final opportunity, is granted to the respondents to comply with the judgment, subject to costs of Rs.2500/- to be paid to the petitioner on the next date of hearing. List on 08.04.2026.” 2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that respondents have issued consideration order on 19.03.2026 towards implementation of the judgment. A copy of order has been placed on record. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner also acknowledges issuance of aforesaid office order. Respondents have also moved an application CMP No. 7158/2026 for recalling/ modification of order dated 18.03.2026 whereby the cost was imposed upon them for not implementing the judgment. In terms of the application, respondents had already processed the case of the petitioner in compliance of judgment on 18.03.2026. Taking note of pleadings of the applicants, cost imposed under order dated 18.03.2026 shall stand waived of. 4. In view of above, the present execution petition stands disposed of. Petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 08, 2026 Judge yogesh