RAM NATH v. COMMISSIONER LKO DIVISION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
A227/3894/2025 · 2025-07-02
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 148090 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:37158 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3894 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Nath Respondent :- Commissioner Lko Division Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey,Rajendra Kumar Rajbhar,Vijay Kumar Jaiswal Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Suresh Chadras Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2.Learned counsel for petitioner at the very outset prays for and is permitted to implead Board of Revenue as respondent in the present writ petition to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection.
3. Accordingly, learned counsel for petitioner is permitted to implead Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh as respondent in the memo of writ petition during course of the day.
4. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent nos. 3 and 4, is hereby dispensed with.
5. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to decide the Stay Application filed by the petitioner in the Second Appeal No. SA/2547/2025 Computerized Case No. R20251046002547 (Ram Nath Vs. Commissioner Lucknow Division, Lucknow( U/S 208 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 6- Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
7. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 6-Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, is directed to decide Stay Application
filed by the petitioner in the Second Appeal No. SA/2547/2025 Computerized Case No. R20251046002547 (Ram Nath Vs. Commissioner Lucknow Division, Lucknow( U/S 208 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this
order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
9. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
10. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 2.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench