IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGAb WRIT PETITION NO: 9766 OF 2025 Between: Boya Amrutha, D/o. Hanumantha Rayudu, Aged about 16 years, Minor Rep by natural guardian cum father Talari Hanumantha Rayudu S/o. Late Narayanappa Aged 47 Years, Occ: Agriculture R/o. Kundurpi Mandal, Anantepur District ri 11-203, Mahanthapuram Village, ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Anantapur District, Anantapur. 3. The Thasildar, Kundurpi Mandal, Anantapur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the Endorsement dated 23.9.2024 issued by the O'"* respondent rejecting the claim of the petitioner herein seeking to mutation of her name in revenue records of patta land of Ac. 3.78 cents in Sy No. 404-5 situated at Kundurpi Village and Mandal, Anantapur District as illegal, arbitrary and opposed to the Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India and for consequently directing the respondent No. 3 to mutate the land in Sy No. 404-5 in an extent of Ac. 3.78 cents situated at Kundurpi Village and Mandal, Anantapur District may duly setting aside the Endorsement dated 23.9.2024 got issued by the 3 respondent. \A ^ 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^^ respondent to mutation of the name of petitioner in revenue records of patta land of Ac.3.78 cents in Sy.No.404-5 situated at Kundurpi Village and Mandal, Ananthapur District vide MUT No.2408 1306 1612 duly suspending the Endorsement dated 23.09.2024 issued by the 3 respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.SREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: ASST.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER rd rd / APHC010184742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) stia Hr:::-:-: [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9766/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Boya Amrutha AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.ASREEDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9766/2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs;- “to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the endorsement dated 23.09.2024 issued by the 3^^ respondent rejecting the claim of the petitioner herein seeking to mutation of her name in revenue records of patta land of Ac. 3.78 cents in Sy. No. 404-5 situated at Kundurpi village and mandal, Anantapur District as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3^^ respondent to mutate the subject land in revenue records duly setting aside the endorsement dated 23.09.2024 got issued by the 3^^ respondent and pass such other order”. Though the petitioner made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested this Court, to permit the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondents and direct the respondents to dispose of the said representation. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue agreed 3. to dispose of the representation, if any, to be submitted by the petitioner. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant 4. Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court that no such direction be issued, in view of the IS conscious - ^ 3 judgment of the Apex Court in ttThe Government of India v. P.Venkatesh^ wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioner himself requested to permit the petitioner to submit a fresh representation and direct the respondents to dispose of such representation, this Court finds no other alternative except to issue such direction. 5. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the respondents and upon submitting the same, the respondents shall consider and dispose of said representation, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, at the earliest. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy registrar T2019(8) scale 544 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 1^.. 2. The District Collector, Anantapur District, Anantapur. 3. The Thasildar, Kundurpi Mandal, Anantapur District. 4. One CC to Sri A.Sreedhar, Advocate [OPUC] GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 5. TwoCCsto 6. Three CD Copies. gi HIGH COURT gi DATED:21/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.9766 of 2025 X 21, APR 2025 ^ . Current Secuon ^ gesPATC^jgg^ DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS